Chris: but no one is talking about “backdating the rules” the legal definition of torture has not changed the tactics employed under the bush administration were legally torture at the time they were permitted, and they are legally torture now. View essay - phil 201 - to torture or not to torture prisoners from phil 104 at liberty university to torture or not to torture prisoners torture is taken to be a process of inflicting pain to. Phil 201 discussion board forums 2 5 to torture or not to tortureyou are a federal agent working for the department of homeland security’scounter-terrorist .
Not only does the very text of the convention recognize the difference between cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and torture, but the united states clearly chose to criminalize only torture abu ghurayb abuses. In the end, the risk posed by confirming haspel is not that she will authorize another round of torture if president trump were to press that course on her in the aftermath of a terrorist attack. Lastly, torture is not the way to fight terror, or as wonderfully put in the words of former un secretary general kofi annan: torture can never be an instrument to fight terror, for torture is an .
Washington, dc, january 4, 2008 – a spate of films from hollywood, a string of revelations by the press, jousting between gop and democratic presidential candidates and among themselves, and the senate confirmation hearings of michael mukasey all recently contributed to the reinvigoration of what had been a virtually stalled debate over the use of torture in interrogations of terrorists. The idea of torture was seen only as something that happened far away in time, and it should not even be considered as an issue of the modern society furthermore, torture was seen as a violation of the fundamental human rights, which were protected by different human rights conventions. “i believe strongly that torture is not moral, legal or effective ” guantanamo is “a damaging symbol to the world a rallying cry for terrorist recruitment and harmful to our national security, so closing it is important for our national security. 227k likes, 729 comments - torrey devitto (@torreydevitto) on instagram: “to torture or not to torture that is the question muahaha 😈”. The best method to answer the question of to torture or not to torture some one would have to be the utilitarianism perspective with this idea it is the majority of the people that we are concerned about.
Topic: to torture or not to torture note: in order to fulfill this assignment, you need to have read the group discussion board forum 2 instructions and the following chapters from holmes: chs 4–7, 14. Brave men do not gather by thousands to torture and murder a single individual, so gagged and bound he cannot make even feeble resistance or defense ida b wells brave , men , single , resistance , defense. The whole discourse on torture in the past years is so dismal and bleak not only because i do not want the innocent to suffer, but because ultimately we distort ourselves as a society i ask you: what kind of civilization do we think we will be left with. Torture is a painful experience on the side of the person to whom the torture is done the main goal is to force a person to confess and produce some vital information torture is often used as a judicial process of impelling prisoners to give information. Torture treats the victim as a means to an end and not an end in themselves it treats the victim as a 'thing', not as a person with all the value that we associate with persons.
In regards to the question about whether or not it is ethically appropriate for a nation to use torture to extract information in order to save lives from an imminent threat (and all other means of obtaining the information have been exhausted) the many different theories of ethics will have many different answers. It may not be known that the other person involved in this conversation is an exwar veteran that had to use torture so save thousands of lives, or that the person could have been a prisoner of war and endured the pain of torture in order to protect this person’s country. If the result cannot be linked backed to torture then the use of torture becomes invalid additionally there can be multiple outcomes not foreseen even if these happened to be true, the non-use of torture is only justifiable if the majority of society benefits from the non-action.
Torture is not only immoral, but a tool for war may 8, 2018 • 17 comments when the senate intelligence committee begins questioning cia director-nominee gina haspel on wednesday they should . I do not believe in torture i feel it is not a necessary i don't feel that criminals or anyone being tortured feels any remorse for what they have done there is just the pain of the moment. However, his legislation is not a novel idea 1948's universal declaration of human rights, to which the us was a participant, prohibited the use of torture in addition, during the reagan administration, the united states negotiated and ratified the convention against torture. Torture is not all or nothing: some instances are worse than others, and at the lower end of the spectrum torture shades gradually into forms of harming that are horrible but do not rise quite to the level of torture.